This Month Marks the 3rd Anniversary of One of the Worst Decisions in History

Support is growing to overturn the U.S. Supreme Court decision that allowed a flood of corporate money into the election system.


Last year, comedian Stephen Colbert’s “super” political action committee (PAC) raised over a million dollars that he said was used “to materially influence the elections – in full accordance with the law.”  “It’s the way our founding fathers would have wanted it,” he said, “if they had founded corporations instead of just a country.”

Colbert was poking fun at what many Americans believe to be one of the worst U.S. Supreme Court decisions in our nation's history. 

This month marks the 3rd anniversary of the controversial Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission decision, which narrowly passed by a 5-4 vote on January 21, 2010 and gave corporations the status of individuals for the purpose of election contributions. 

Following that decision and others in lower courts, the FEC implemented changes in the election laws that further expanded corporate power.  Super-PACs were born to legally channel unlimited amounts of money to campaigns, giving corporate interests enormous influence over government policy. 

With public welfare already taking a back seat to corporate profit, the Citizens United decision was utterly misguided.  The inevitable effect of the ruling was of such concern that even retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor spoke against it.

In the three years since the decision, a national movement has taken root to overturn Citizens United by amending the U.S. Constitution.  There is broad support from businesses, organizations, and individuals across the political spectrum.

In October 2012, New Jersey became then the 9th state in the nation to pass a resolution supporting an amendment-to-overturn. 

Included with this post is an impressive 27-page paper written by Elizabeth Rassweiler, who has a masters degree from New York University and further graduate work in public administration.  Ms. Rassweiler does a commendable job explaining the impact of the Citizens United decision, other related cases, and subsequent FEC actions.  The paper’s introduction (the first 4 pages) provides of good summary of the key issues and is a very good read.  The paper is current as of January 2012.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Linda Baum January 23, 2013 at 07:57 PM
So, folks, are you in favor of removing special interest money from elections or not? For or against overturning Citizens United?
jerseyswamps January 23, 2013 at 08:13 PM
So, "special interest money" includes unions?
Jack N. Coke January 23, 2013 at 09:56 PM
Of course special interest money includes the unions, the gay & lesbian victory fund , eqca, meck PAC, honor PAC and all the others they spend 10x more than the kochs. adelson and Rove's people combined and the bad part in the case of unions is that the dues are compulsory and half of the people in the unions do not agree with the leftist views of people like randee weingarten.
jerseyswamps January 23, 2013 at 11:45 PM
Jack, I agree. I was asking Ms. Baum if this includes unions or are unions somehow different because they supposedly represent the "good" struggling middle class. How about an answer, Ms. Baum?
Joe January 24, 2013 at 04:04 AM
Ms. Baum would not dare to include the unions since they run and fund the Democrat party in NJ. Just think, the president of the ironworkers union is the senate president!!!!! What chance does Christie have of really getting a handle on the destruction wreaked by the unions on the taxpayers of this state. Typical liberal hypocrisy. One set of rules for Democrats and another fpr the rest of the world. Reminds me of the exemption unions got from Obamacare.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »