.

At Earth Day, Some Say They Like Wind Turbines

Although there has been strong opposition by many against the BRSA's wind turbine planned for Union Beach, some environmentally-minded residents are in favor.

At Holmdel’s Earth Day Festival at Bayonet Farm, there were many people advocating for alternative energy.

Because wind turbines have been in the news lately, Patch wanted to ask people their thoughts were regarding the one planned by the Bayshore Regional Sewerage Authority for its plant operations in Union Beach.

There has been strong opposition by people in Union Beach and neighboring Hazlet who say the 396-foot tall turbine it is too big and too close to their homes and will cause them health problems and loss in property values. The Holmdel Township Committee recently passed a resolution opposing the construction of the turbine, as has several other towns.

But the BRSA says the turbine will generate energy and help reduce rates for ratepayers in the towns it serves: Union Beach, Holmdel, Keyport, Hazlet, Keansburg, Matawan, Aberdeen, and parts of Marlboro. The BRSA’s current chairman is John Colligas, of Holmdel.

At the festival, Holmdel resident and environmentalist Chris Yonclas discussed the turbine at a raingarden exhibit. Yonclas said he personally liked the idea of the proposed wind turbine in Union Beach.

“The only problem I have with it, from an environmental standpoint, is that the geese are dominant in that area,” said Yonclas. (The geese, or any bird, could wind up flying into the blades of the wind turbine, he explained.)

Yonclas added he would not like to live next to one because of “the whopping sound.” But then again, he said, he’s lived next to the Garden State Parkway for 20 years. “The noise becomes secondary,” he said. 

Holmdel resident Jenni Blumenthal, who was giving out flyers on trees, mulch volcanoes and stinkbugs, said she is personally in favor of the wind turbines. Even the one proposed for Union Beach.

According to Blumenthal, if you want something, you have to pay the price. “If you want electricity you have make it somehow. If you want to use a cell phone, you got to put up cell phone towers,” she said. “There is a lot of controversy about it. I might be in the minority around here, but I think it’s a good idea to make use of the wind as a source of power”.

Robert “Bob” Wilson, of Holmdel, the 1978 Nobel Peace Prize co-winner in Physics, was the man in the cowboy hat telling people about ways to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. He said that he and his wife, Betsy, first encountered a string of wind turbines during a trip to Holland. “I don't know how much is known about the health effects of constant noise, but it should be considered,” said Wilson, who wrote an email to Patch, the next day. "As for wind turbines being placed near residences, one would have to know the expected noise from the proposed turbine.  I would hope that the noise would be minimal inside houses."

Elise Donovan of Holmdel said she would like to know more about the controversy, because in the end, something needs to be done about the cost of electricity, she said. 

“I know there’s just a lot of controversy surrounding the Bayshore Regional Sewerage Authority, so I’m not sure if people are unhappy with the Authority, and therefore they aren’t to say ‘Go forward with another project.' It’s complicated.” 

But she added, “We need to find more clean sources of energy. Our electric bills are getting higher and higher.” Last month, Donovan said her electric bill was $500.

Bill Heller May 04, 2011 at 05:18 AM
Industrial wind turbines, first brought to market in a major way by Enron, are touted by proponents as a solution to global warming. However, INDUSTRIAL WIND TURBINES DO NOT PROVIDE RENEWABLE ENERGY!!! After many years of wind turbines in use, not one coal or gas plant the world over has been decommissioned because of IWTs - and eliminating our dependence on fossil fuels is their raison d’etre. To quote an expert: “Because wind blows intermittently, electric utilities must either keep their conventional power plants running all the time to make sure the lights don’t go dark, or continually ramp up and down the output from conventional coal-or gas-fired generators (called “cycling”). But coal-fired and gas-fired generators are designed to run continuously, and if they don’t, fuel consumption and emissions generally increase.” This is happening in places like Colorado and Texas where CO2 and power plant pollution have increased since they installed wind farms: http://www.denverpost.com/headlines/ci_15081808 Plus, property values close to IWTs take a big hit due to genuine noise and health concerns. For this reason, Denmark (among other places) requires power companies to compensate owners close to wind turbines for loss-of-value: http://www.ens.dk/en-us/supply/renewable-energy/windpower/onshore-wind-power/loss-of-value-to-real-property/sider/forside.aspx IWTs are big business, just like ethanol derived from corn. Even Al Gore stated that one's a lousy idea.
Milton R. May 04, 2011 at 05:36 AM
No NJ politician or wind developer will ever suggested that home values should be guaranteed within a mile of industrial wind turbines. Homes close to wind turbine installations lose tens of thousands of dollars in equity, and the closest ones can become unsaleable. Wind turbines should not be sited close to residential areas - PERIOD. Here’s sworn testimony from a certified appraiser on property values and wind turbines. It’s must reading: http://nowindfarms.com/blog/testimony-of-michael-mccann-on-property-value-impacts-in-adams-county-il/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+CwwsSharedItemsInGoogleReader+%28Cohocton+Wind+Watch+-+Google+Reader%29&utm_content=FeedBurner Homeowners should not be asked to be good “green patriots” and “take one for the team” for a technology that does not live up to its claims! In fact, IWT’s are a gift to the coal and gas industries. Here’s are two great articles on how inefficient they are at providing power when needed: http://www.energytribune.com/articles.cfm/6310/Britains-Wind-Farms-are-No-Spin-Zones-When-Cold-Hits http://opinion.financialpost.com/2011/03/05/lawrence-solomon-don%E2%80%99t-count-on-constant-electricity-under-renewable-energy-says-uk-electricity-ceo/ Implementing better conservation efforts such as LED lighting in government and commercial buildings, better insulation, etc. will reduce carbon output and power demand better than a plethora of wind turbines.
Anita D. May 04, 2011 at 07:17 AM
These windmills are like weight loss suplements. We spend millions on them, they don't work at all, they endgager our well being, but they make us feel like we're doing something. And like with being overweight, the only way to really get something done is to cut back on consumption. One day someone will develop a miracle pill for both our energy and our weight problems, but we ain't there yet.
Bart Sutton May 04, 2011 at 11:05 AM
It seems as though lots of folks are for the fact that a turbine is not being built near their homes, and even the "environmentalist" is completely unaware of the many endangered species where the proposed turbine is sited. Have a look for yourself http://www.flickr.com/photos/ndcsbd1/sets/72157600004658841/ There are more species like Bald Eagles that aren't seen in this set of photo's that visit, forage and nest at Conaskonk Point. Even the the study on Global Warming and Sea Level Rise counts this patch of land as Critical Habitat. I for one would expect an opinion to be formed from careful consideration and at least a cursory knowledge of the issue. It seems however that since the wind lobbyists have been saying for years that this is a "Green Technology" without telling you that each one produces between 11,000 and 44,000 tons of slightly radioactive toxic waste to build one. (Neodymium magnets) http://www.torontosun.com/comment/columnists/christina_blizzard/2011/02/25/17412836.html Remember, you can't give away just a little of your environmental protections, you give them all away when you condone the shortcuts the BRSA and the DEP are taking rather than full independent studies.
Joe S May 04, 2011 at 01:33 PM
I noticed Every person being quoted here has already noted a negative of these IWT's even if they don't live near it. If there are questionable effects then Why would we Hurry and allow them to be built. Also I would Like to Mention that Bob Fisher at a Packed meeting of the B.R.S.A. Said "If the noise is bottering YOU Call ME and I WILL Shut it OFF" Well Let Me tell you first hand You will Not get an answer after 430 pm , and this is because the office is closed and after 11pm and on weekends there is No one there . Until just recently you could get someone on the phone but they changed even that.
Barbara May 04, 2011 at 02:11 PM
I agree with your analogy. I have a wind turbine approx. 275' from my front door. Besides the noise, besides the shadow flicker and sun glare....it is not saving our town money but costing us money. And even before the blades fell off of the one in Lacey Twsp. in the beginning of March (2011) I was concerned about that thing spinning over the heads of traffic, pedestrians, and local employees. The ones in the ocean I have seen reports that they believe dead whales may be due to their sonar systems being messed up from the pounding of the turbine bases in the sea flooring. There are more down sides that I see to this than good sides. I agree with Anita that to cut back is the way to go.
Katherine Reilly May 04, 2011 at 02:22 PM
Earth Day? Reading some of the comments about people wanting to know more or what should be considered?.....Attend the meetings, look at all the research papers presented regarding the inefficiency, the health issues, the sound, the flicker, what it will do to endangered species, let alone our life long investment in our homes, then you have the right to say for or against. And yes, unfortunately, those of us within the footprint of this industrial turbine "we will pay the price" but at what cost? Not once has any consideration been give to us by those who have the "power" to build this turbine. Kudos to Hazlet and the other towns installing solar canopies that will do more than just reduce the carbon output.
Pete P. May 05, 2011 at 09:45 AM
Many who hail the benefits of industrial windmills on Earth Day do not know about the environmental devastion the mining of rare earths for their magnests (thousands of pounds each) causes. I read this in the Toronto Sun and there's more available from other sources: "Mining mineral for windmill magnets causes environmental disaster." http://www.torontosun.com/comment/columnists/christina_blizzard/2011/02/25/17412836.html
Bill Heller May 05, 2011 at 05:01 PM
(Riverhead News-Review) "State findings: Sewer plant turbine not worth it." One has to ask the question, "Would an audit by an independent and knowledgeable third party arrive at the same conclusion regarding the "BRSA's planned turbine?" I believe an audit of the BRSA is also needed for a host of other issues that have been the subject of much public controversy as of late. http://riverheadnewsreview.timesreview.com/2011/05/13867/state-findings-sewer-plant-turbine-not-worth-it/

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something