patching...
Breaking: Officials: Third Indicent at CEI, Leaks Not Carbon Monoxide »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Bill Calling for Examination of Coastal Evacuations Advances in New Jersey Senate

The Transportation Committee passed the bill on second reading Monday, March 4.

 

With a Coastal Flood Watch in effect for the entire region and the memory of Superstorm Sandy still fresh in everyone’s minds, the Senate Transportation Committee approved legislation requiring a state study and report on transportation infrastructure needs in coastal counties on Monday, March 4.

Bill S-1547, introduced by Sen. Christopher J. Connors, Assemblyman Brian E. Rumpf and Assemblywoman DiAnne C. Gove, calls for an examination of the infrastructure needs in Atlantic, Cape May, Ocean, Monmouth, Cumberland and Salem counties.

Among the issues that would be examined:

  • necessary construction of new roads, highways, bridges, and rail lines;
  • necessary repair,maintenance, and improvement of existing roads, highways, bridges, and rail lines;
  • the environmental impact of any new construction;
  • the infrastructure needs of each county and the region as a whole in preparing for the safe and expedient evacuation of the coast in the event of an emergency, including appropriate evacuation routes and alternative means of evacuation;
  • the alleviation of traffic congestion;
  • the estimated costs of meeting the transportation infrastructure needs of each county and the region as a whole;
  • the availability of federal funds; and
  • any other information relevant to the subject of the report.

The Deparmtent of Transportation and the New Jersey Transit Corporation may consult with the South Jersey Transportation Authority and the New Jersey Turnpike Authority about infrastructure needs for toll roads, according to the bill.

They would also be permitted to consult with the Superintendent of State Police and the Director of the Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness in putting together this report, which must be completed within six months of the effective date.

According to Connors, the delegation felt a report of this nature was necessary as a comparison to the infrastructure inefficiencies related to the evacuations in New Orleans related to Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita.

“It was important to ensure that the transportation infrastructure in our state’s coastal area would be able to handle the high volume of traffic that would be created by an emergency situation should a similar devastating event hit New Jersey’s coast,” Connors said. “Now, we know all too well after Hurricane Irene and more recently Superstorm Sandy that our state is vulnerable to the types of severe weather that can lead to the loss of life, cause unimaginable devastation and require large-scale evacuations.”

Sandy hit the area in October, and devastated much of New Jersey’s coast, although Atlantic and Cape May counties were spared the bulk of the devastation.

 “Prioritizing critical infrastructure needs in our state’s coastal areas has been taken on a whole new level of importance in light of Superstorm Sandy and its unforgettable impact on our area,” said Rumpf, who serves as the ranking Republican member of the Assembly Transportation, Public Works and Independent Authorities Committee.  “For decades, our area of the state was under-resourced in terms of transportation infrastructure dollars.  This unfortunate reality, coupled with the fact that our area has a basically nonexistent public transportation system, required our Delegation to call for a comprehensive assessment of the existing infrastructure as a means of identifying and addressing needed upgrades.”   

Rumpf was the vice chairman of the Coastal New Jersey Evacuation Task Force. Recommendations in a report submitted to the legislature by that task force in 2008 contributed to legislation signed into law by Gov Chris Christie two months ago.

“I have a true understanding of the critical role infrastructure plays in an emergency evacuation,” said Gove, a former mayor of Long Beach Island.  “With the Route 72 Causeway Bridge serving as the only means of ingress and egress from Long Beach Island, local emergency coordinators were confronted by serious challenges in evacuating residents to safety when Hurricane Irene and then Superstorm Sandy hit.  This is just one example, albeit a glaring one, of why a comprehensive assessment of the state’s coastal transportation infrastructure is needed in moving forward with the rebuilding process.” 

S-1547 is now up for vote by the full chamber. The Assembly version of the bill, A-2469, is currently before the Assembly Transportation, Public Works and Independent Authorities Committee.

A copy of each bill is attached to this story as a PDF.

Related Topics: Coastal Evacuations and NJ Legislature

Steve

2:37 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Oh well, someone who gets this contract will make a lot of money, and the State poorer. It's like we have all these signs posted around the country showing the Evacuation Route to follow. There is no doubt this was our Federal Governments stimulus money being wasted. It will never end....

Reply

Amy Seeley

2:46 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Exactly! Wait until the kenyan gets his newly appointed epa administratir to start some kind of ridiculous cap amd trade system to further enrich the enviro terrorists.

Reply

Liz

3:16 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013

The Kenyan -- incredible!

Reply

its over

8:16 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Ha,i love it.Did You ever imagine our American presidents name would be barack Hussein obama, think about that for a minute

Reply

shorecorruption

9:59 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Yes go to Newark airport and a Arab is the TSA agent, and he dosen't speak English very well.

Reply

George Clark

10:14 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013

neither did most of our ancestors that got off the boat your nickname is fitting because your small mind is shorely corrupted

Reply

Mac

8:26 am on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Ah, the ‘feel-good guys’ back-slapping nicety-nice 9th District legislation of the month announcement. They want us to pay real money to some politically-connected outfit to hoodwink the public into believing that evacuating the NJ coastal area during an emergency is possible for anyone except perhaps the first line of evacuees. On a sunny summer Sunday afternoon when tens of thousands of people head home after a relaxing day or weekend at the beach, there is state-wide gridlock up and down the Parkway, Expressway, and the few mostly single-lane at some point state highways leading away from the shore. And that is with most of the area residents staying at home and these travelers not troubled by a panicky or overanxious state of mind. During a normal rainstorm many of the coastal area roads flood to some degree regularly, and I’m not talking about just the shore towns. I live several miles west of LBI and during Hurricane Sandy, like many of the other severe weather conditions we normally experience, traffic wasn’t going anywhere on Route 72 without a surfboard to help out. It doesn’t take many flooded-out vehicles to shut down a road, regardless of whether or not there are 300,000 people on LBI. Since we are going to spend all this money to basically replace signs already in place, may I suggest the signs be mounted on buoys this time so that when our car floods, we have a path to follow while swimming for our lives.

Reply

shorefriend

8:29 am on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

It's amazing the hate in this forum, for god sake it's the president of the USA you are all racist bigots, your ignorance disgusts me!

Reply

Kenneth P.

8:35 am on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

I am with you, shorefriend. What a bunch of classless, racists, lowlife

Reply

Steve

11:12 am on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

I started this with comments about wasting additional money on a report that will go no where. We don't have the money to do anything further with our roads. It would be nice if they could just repave what we have. Having said that I agree with Mac. It is what it is and again stop wasting more money with additional studies. Not sure how the President got involved, that's another whole story by itself

Reply

commonman

1:00 pm on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

the president is a racist lowlife and wants to destroy this country

Reply
Comment_arrow

Phillip Jack Brooks

1:07 pm on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

true dat. he can barely contain his contempt for the american people that do not line up and allow him to try and destroy this country.

Comment_arrow

Phillip Jack Brooks

1:21 pm on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Can you believe what this guy is up to? He is a bully. He will do anything to further his corrupt agenda that the american people do not want.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323494504578342603236052908.html?mod=hp_opinion

Comment_arrow

Beach_N8iv

3:11 pm on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

It would seem, from the election results, that a majority of Americans DO agree with the President. Just because you Fox "News" addicts didn't get your elitist bigot in office you will spend the next four years whining. Oh well, too bad, you lost, WE WON!

Comment_arrow

Phillip Jack Brooks

3:17 pm on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

The problem is the urban people that voted for him cannot read and write or understand the most simple of issues. They are just racist and vote for him becuase of his color. They dont want his elitist bs. Just like you - you actually think you won because he is in the white house with jayz visiting drinking grape soda and ruining the country that you live in fool!

barry

1:46 pm on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

barry this is not the united states of america i grew up in the sixtys seventys or eightys there is nothing UNITED about thisa country any more it is a shame and discrace to all of us amen

Reply

Kenneth P.

2:44 pm on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

the comments here are a shame and disgrace to all of us

Reply
Comment_arrow

Phillip Jack Brooks

3:02 pm on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Yeah kenny "I am with you, shorefriend. What a bunch of classless, racists, lowlife"

Kenneth P.

4:04 pm on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

I voted for Obama and someone else is writing this for me - because I can't read or write - but don't tell me that JayZ is in the white house drinking grape soda - that is going too far and if I had known that JayZ would be drinking grape soda in the white house - why, what if he spills it? Isn't the white house white? Won't that make a big purple stain? And Philip - your confused -the classless ones were the ones who made derogatory remarks about the President, and so did you, so I guess - you are one of the classless, blah blahs anyway something must be done about the grape soda - I think a protest is in order outside the white house before it becomes the purple house because it is inevitable that soda spills especially when you know who types are drinking it

Reply
Comment_arrow

Martin

4:29 pm on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

3 REPUBS sponsored this bill, you idiot conservative complainers! Connors, Rumpf and Gove are GOP reps in District 9. (You could look it up if you weren't so busy spewing racist hatred!) Therefore, all above comments by Tea Baggers are null and void, and should apply to the NJ chapter of the Party of No instead.

George

4:38 pm on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

GOTCHA -- Steve, Amy, Liz, its over, Philp, commonman and other hate-mongers!
Now why don't you complain about your 3 Repugnant legislators? Why don't you call them some racist-inspired names? Turn off Faux News and join the 21st century. The South lost that 19th century war.

Reply

My heart goes out to you

5:21 pm on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Excuse. But the comment by Liz. Incredible. Was a comment of disgust that someone called our President "the Kenyan". Not a comment of agreement!

Reply

Mrgrumpass

9:19 am on Thursday, March 7, 2013

Do any of these State Reps live in the affected areas? And these improvements prove to be needed they should be paid for with a consumption tax so the slackers get to contribute not just another tax on the worker Bees!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Johnjcpa

9:44 am on Thursday, March 7, 2013

In your world, a consumption tax (meaning a sales tax) doesn't fall on the worker bees?

James D'Monquay

10:43 am on Thursday, March 7, 2013

Let's stay on topic. According to the WH, if one life can be saved, then no one should be able to live at the shore. Thus, there's no reason for an evaculation plan. Everyone is making this waaay to complicated.

Reply

Leave a comment